The executive - The Constitution Society (2023)

On this page you will find discussion and analysis of the UK executive. The content here is specifically designed for A level politics and early undergraduate level students looking to deepen their understanding of the topic. At A level, the component 2 topic on The Executive looks at the power of the Prime Minister in the UK, their relationship with the Cabinet and Parliament and whether the constitution sets out enough safeguards against executive dominance.

Click on any of the questions below to be taken to the answer.

What is the executive?

What are the main roles and powers of the executive?

How much of the roles and powers of the executive are dealt with in the constitution and where can they be found?

What is the Cabinet and what does it do?

What is cabinet government and the convention of collective cabinet responsibility?

Why have modern prime ministers been criticised for undermining cabinet government?

How strong is collective cabinet responsibility and how does it manifest in modern cabinets?

What do Prime Minsters have to consider before appointing ministers?

What is the Ministerial Code?

What is individual ministerial responsibility?

To what extent do ministers resign today because of individual ministerial responsibility?


(Video) Executive Branch - Understanding the Constitution on the Learning Videos Channel

Further reading

What is the executive?

The term ‘executive’ refers to the government: those who make the key decisions and run the country day to day. In the UK system, the party with the most seats in the House of Commons is typically invited to form a government. The government – which is made up of the Prime Minister, the Cabinet and various junior ministers – is drawn from individuals who sit in Parliament, usually from the winning party. The Prime Minister is normally the leader of that party, and they have the power to appoint the other members of the government. This includes the most important ‘Great Offices of State’: the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who is in charge of economic policy; the Foreign Secretary; and the Home Secretary. However, there are many more government departments, each led by a Secretary of State or their equivalent and appointed by the Prime Minister.

This is what is referred to as a parliamentary, rather than presidential system. This means there is a degree of ‘fusion’ or connection between the legislature and the executive (as the government is drawn out of and sits in the legislature).

What are the main roles and powers of the executive?

The executive holds a lot of power within the UK system. Most legislation is introduced to Parliament by the government, which to a large extent controls the agenda and time of the House of Commons. The government proposes an annual budget which sets out how it will spend money over the coming year. The government also has the discretion to make a broad range of policy decisions in areas such as transport, education and health. These policies are often carried out through what is known as secondary or delegated legislation. Acts of Parliament often grant ministers and other bodies extensive powers that can be used to develop a policy further, without having to go through the full process of passing a new statute. These delegated executive powers can be broad, but ministers are not allowed to go beyond what is set out in primary legislation. If they do, this can be challenged in the courts through judicial review.

The executive also holds other powers, called Royal Prerogative powers. These are the powers that are in theory attached to the monarch, but are now in practice largely exercised by the government. They can be used without having to get consent from Parliament. They include powers to conduct foreign policy, including conducting diplomacy and deploying the army, to grant honours, and to prorogue Parliament (which means to end its current session). These powers have often been controversial, as there are limited checks and constraints on their use by the executive.

How much of the roles and powers of the executive are dealt with in the constitution and where can they be found?

The role and powers of the executive are in many ways unclear, as many of them are defined only by conventions, rules which do not have any formal legal basis. There is no single legal document that clearly defines the role of the government and the limits of its power.

Prerogative powers are a particular source of confusion. They are not set out in statute, but come from the common law (law which is developed by judges in relation to customs and precedents). It is difficult to say exactly what prerogative powers still exist as some of them have not been used for many centuries. Furthermore, there is no generally accepted definition of what constitutes a Royal Prerogative and their scope, according to the Ministry of Justice, ‘is notoriously difficult to determine.’

In 2011, the first (and, thus far, only) edition of a document called the Cabinet Manual was published. It was initiated by then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown, but published under the coalition government that followed. It was intended to provide ‘a source of information on the laws, convention and rules that affect the operation and procedures of the Government.’

It is the only place that some of the most important conventions surrounding the executive’s functions and powers are set out. One of these is, for example, the understanding that the Prime Minister is head of the government by virtue of his or her ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons. It refers to some of the other conventions mentioned above as well, such as the understanding that an individual should only be a minister if they have a seat in either the Commons or the Lords.

(Video) How Powerful is the Executive Branch? [No. 86]

However, none of the above is set out in statute law and the Cabinet Manual, despite helping to clarify and explain the UK constitution, is not intended to have legal force. It describes the role of the government from the perspective of the executive itself. Furthermore, it has not been reissued since 2011, so some of the information it contains is now out of date.

Further reading: Baroness Taylor of Bolton, ‘An updated Cabinet Manual is needed to maintain public trust, ethical standards and our constitution’

What is the Cabinet and what does it do?

The Cabinet is the most senior, formal decision-making body of government. It is chaired by the Prime Minister and made up of the most senior ministers. The Prime Minister decides who can attend Cabinet. The Cabinet is intended to provide a forum for the Prime Minister and their ministers to discuss and decide together on the government’s policies and what approach it should take to issues.

Here is a list of the current cabinet ministers and their departments in the UK government.

What is cabinet government and the convention of collective cabinet responsibility?

Cabinet government refers to a way of governing where the Cabinet debates an issue and then decides on a collective, unified position. It rests on a convention referred to as collective cabinet responsibility. This means that ministers can express their own views on a matter in Cabinet meetings, but that once a collective decision has been reached, they must support that decision in public. The idea is that decisions are based on open discussion and that the Prime Minister is ‘first among equals’. This also means that the Cabinet share joint responsibility for all of the government’s decisions. As the Cabinet Manual explains, ‘collective responsibility allows ministers to express their views frankly in discussion, in the expectation that they can maintain a united front once a decision has been reached.’ According to this principle, the Prime Minister summarises the view of the Cabinet, but does not dictate what its decisions should be.

Why have modern prime ministers been criticised for undermining cabinet government?

It is sometimes said that cabinet government has been weakened by some Prime Ministers in recent times. They have been accused of not properly consulting with their Cabinets, or allowing for a full and proper discussion amongst Cabinet members. Tony Blair was accused of conducting ‘sofa government’, where he would discuss important policy issues with particular ministers or advisers outside of Cabinet meetings. Cabinet meetings would then be short with limited discussion of policies that had been largely been agreed elsewhere. Blair was accused of governing in a more ‘presidential’ style because of this.

When Gordon Brown succeeded Tony Blair as Prime Minister he promised ‘cabinet government, not sofa government’. However, Brown himself admitted that he wasn’t successful in restoring cabinet government. David Cameron made the same pledge, but the coalition government was in the end dominated by the ‘quad’, who made most of the key decisions. Theresa May held much more substantial Cabinet meetings than her predecessors, with lengthy discussions and opportunities to speak. Nevertheless, it has been pointed out that key policy decisions, such as around Brexit and the 2017 Conservative manifesto, were still not really taken in Cabinet, but elsewhere.

Further reading: The Chicot Report criticised Tony Blair for failing to act through Cabinet in the lead up to the Iraq war. This article explains the main findings of the report and the lessons for the machinery of government.

How strong is collective cabinet responsibility and how does it manifest in modern cabinets?

(Video) Executive president enjoys trappings of power the constitution provides - Martin Kpebu

The outward facing aspect of collective responsibility is that all ministers unite publicly around decisions reached, regardless of their private opinions. If they are not able to refrain publicly from disagreeing with policy, they are supposed to resign. However, collective cabinet responsibility in this sense can sometimes be explicitly set aside. This was done by David Cameron in 2016 in the run up to the referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union. Despite the fact that he and his government advocated the UK staying in the EU, he allowed members of his Cabinet who wanted to dissent from this position in the referendum campaign without needing to resign. Some say that collective cabinet responsibility was weakened in the long-term by this decision, even after Cameron left office.

The premiership of Theresa May in particular was marked by prominent apparent breaches of collective cabinet responsibility: ministers regularly publicly expressed dissent from the government’s Brexit position, leaks of Cabinet discussions were commonplace, and various ministers publicly advocated alternative Brexit policies. This even extended to ministers voting against the government. Typically, a minister would be expected to resign or be sacked in these circumstances. However, Theresa May often did not take action for such breaches of cabinet collective responsibility, which in turn encouraged more disloyalty.

It is far harder to maintain cabinet collective responsibility if there are deep divisions on an issue within the governing party – as was the case for the Conservatives in relation to Brexit. On becoming Prime Minister, Boris Johnson appointed a Cabinet primarily made up of people who had supported Brexit or were clearly willing to do so in future, which avoided some of the problems faced by his predecessors.

Further reading: Chris Malone, ‘Cabinet collective responsibility: how it works, and why it survives’

What do Prime Minsters have to consider before appointing ministers?

As this indicates, Prime Ministers have to keep a number of different factors in mind when it comes to deciding on who the ministers in their government should be. One important factor is whether they are capable of doing the job of running or helping to run a government department. To be a Secretary of State in a major government office is challenging. It requires managerial and political skill, as well as policy ideas and the resolve to deliver them. Not everyone possesses these skills. If a Prime Minister puts someone not up to the task in an important position this could backfire – the individual might make mistakes that damage the reputation of the government and harm the party’s chances of re-election.

However, competence isn’t the only thing that Prime Ministers must consider. They must also think about the political leanings of the individuals they appoint to the government and ask whether they can be counted on to support the government’s agenda. As we have seen, if Prime Ministers fail to do this sufficiently, it can lead to a breakdown in collective cabinet responsibility with damaging consequences. This said, appointing a Cabinet purely made up of people who agree with you can also be a bad idea. In this situation, there will be no one to challenge bad ideas, which again might lead to poor policies that damage the government’s reputation. Some Prime Ministers have operated on the basis that it is better to have your potential opponents in the government, as it makes it harder for them to criticise you and mount a possible leadership challenge.

Further reading: Michela Palese, ‘What does the reshuffle mean for constitutional reform?’

What is the Ministerial Code?

According to the UK government’s own definition the Ministerial Code ‘sets out the standards of conduct expected of ministers and how they discharge their duties.’ The document is meant to act as a guide as to how ministers should behave. It contains rules about misleading Parliament, using government resources for personal or Party-political purposes, and accepting gifts, amongst many other things.

The usual practice is for a new edition of the Code to be issued at the start of a new Parliament, or after a new Prime Minister takes office. The document is issued in the name of the Prime Minister and they are responsible for its enforcement. Although they have an adviser who can investigate breaches of the code at their request, it is the Prime Minister who ultimately decides how an offence should be punished.

Much like the Cabinet Manual, the Ministerial Code is not law. Previously, there has been an expectation that ministers would resign or be sacked if they are found to breach the rules set out in the Code. However, this hasn’t always been the case. For example, in 2020, Priti Patel was found to have breached the Code by bullying staff in the Home Office. Despite this, the Prime Minister Boris Johnson allowed her to stay in her senior position in the government. This said, when Priti Patel was found to have broken the Ministerial Code on a previous occasion, this time under Theresa May, she resigned from the government.

(Video) Executive Orders Unconstitutional? | Constitution Corner

Further reading: Andrew Blick, ‘De-coding the constitution?’

What is individual ministerial responsibility?

Individual ministerial responsibility refers to a constitutional convention according to which government ministers are ultimately responsible for the actions of their department. The convention dictates that if there is a failure in the department, the minister in charge of that department bears the responsibility, even if the mistake isn’t directly their fault. The error may have been the result of poor departmental processes or have come from a civil servant. Nevertheless, in these situations, it is the minister who must answer for what went wrong and who would be expected to resign if the failing was serious enough.

The minister is accountable to Parliament for the actions of their department – they must come before Parliament and explain why certain decisions have been taken and why certain things may have gone wrong. For example, then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling had to explain to Parliament in 2007 about the loss of computer disks with vast amounts of personal information on them, even though he did not lose the disks himself. Although it is not set out in law, the principle of ministerial accountability to Parliament is detailed in the Ministerial Code.

To what extent do ministers resign today because of individual ministerial responsibility?

Despite the principle of ministerial responsibility, many ministers do not accept responsibility when things go wrong in their departments. Instead, they often claim that they weren’t aware of the issue, or that it was caused by other individuals or events out of their control. For example, after the exam results fiasco in 2020, the Secretary of State for education, Gavin Williamson, refused to resign despite a major failing and subsequent U-turn by his department. The most senior civil servant in the department resigned, as did the head of Ofqual, the exams regulator, but Williamson stayed in the position and did not accept responsibility.

However, this is not always the case. There have been recent examples of a minister resigning for a departmental failure arguably out of their control. In 2018, then-Home Secretary Amber Rudd resigned in relation to the Windrush scandal, despite the fact that the scandal originated under her predecessor, Theresa May.

Further reading: Nat le Roux, ‘Cronyism, Covid and the constitution’


Click here for a PowerPoint on the executive that condenses the information above. The PowerPoint is primarily designed for teachers covering the topic.

Further reading: Andrew Blick and Peter Hennessy, Good Chaps No More? Safeguarding the Constitution in Stressful Times

Tim Durant, ‘The prime minister can strengthen the system for upholding standards in government without giving up his role as the ultimate arbiter’

(Video) The American Constitution Society


What are the 5 roles of the executive branch? ›

The executive branch is headed by the president, whose constitutional responsibilities include serving as commander in chief of the armed forces; negotiating treaties; appointing federal judges (including the members of the Supreme Court), ambassadors, and cabinet officials; and acting as head of state.

What does the executive do? ›

The executive branch carries out and enforces laws. It includes the president, vice president, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies, and other boards, commissions, and committees.

What are the 7 principles of the Constitution and what does each mean? ›

The Constitution rests on seven basic principles. They are popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, federalism, checks and balances, republicanism, and individual rights. Popular Sovereignty The framers of the Constitution lived at a time when monarchs claimed that their power came from God.

What is the meaning of executive power? ›

The executive, also referred as the executive branch or executive power, is the term commonly used to describe that part of government which enforces the law, and has overall responsibility for the governance of a state.

What are the 3 main powers of the executive branch? ›

Signing or vetoing legislation. Granting presidential pardons or clemencies. Appointing federal positions in government agencies.

What are the 3 roles of executive? ›

Below you can find the typical responsibilities of an executive:
  • Planning managerial processes to improve business administration efficiency.
  • Creating financial strategies for a budget.
  • Overseeing the daily operations of a business or department.
  • Evaluating the productivity and performance of employees.
Jan 3, 2022

Why is executive important? ›

The Executive is one of the important branches of the government without which a government can not function. It implements all the laws or policies framed by the Parliament or the Legislative Assemblies.

How much power does the executive have? ›

The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.

What is the most important principle of the Constitution? ›

The final Principal of the US Constitution is Federalism. Federalism means that the power is shared between Natural and State Governments.

What are 4 of the 6 major principles of the Constitution? ›

Summarize What are the six underlying principles of the Constitution? The six underlying principles of the Constitution are popular sovereignty, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and limited government.

What are the first 7 words of the Constitution? ›

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of ...

What is executive in Constitution? ›

Executive power of the Union is vested in the President, and is exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. Supreme command of defence forces of the Union also vests in him.

What is executive Short answer? ›

The executive refers to a person or group of persons having administrative or supervisory authority in an organization or in government authority. The executive is responsible for executing and enforcing the law.

What is executive and examples? ›

Executive is also an adjective that describes having the power to make decisions. The president of the United States is the executive branch of the government and is responsible for executing laws that will improve the country for its citizens.

What are the 4 executive powers? ›

veto bills and sign bills. represent our nation in talks with foreign countries. enforce the laws that Congress passes. act as Commander-in-Chief during a war.

What are the 7 roles of the executive branch? ›

The Presidential Hats:
  • Chief Citizen.
  • Commander in Chief.
  • Chief Diplomat.
  • Chief Executive.
  • Chief Host.
  • Chief Legislator.
  • Chief Politician.

Why is the executive branch powerful? ›

The executive is the branch of government responsible for the overall governance of a state. In countries which base their political system on the separation of powers, the executive branch of government is responsible for enforcing and executing laws made by the legislative branch of government.

What is the most important executive? ›

Chief executive officer

Primary duties: The chief executive officer is the top executive in many companies. As CEO, you are responsible for major decision-making, managing resources and operations, and defining the company's vision, tone and public image.

Why was an executive important to the success of the constitution? ›

A strong executive is necessary in order to create a good government. It provides protection against foreign attacks; it is essential for implementing law; it helps protect private property; it secures liberty. In fact, Rome would often turn power over to a single ruler in order to protect the state.

Who has the executive power? ›

Article II, Section 1, 1: The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice Pres. . .

How does executive check power? ›

EXECUTIVE (President) can restrain both HOUSE and SENATE by using Veto Power. LEGISLATIVE (Congress - Senate & House) has a check on EXECUTIVE by being able to pass, with 2/3 majority, a bill over President's veto.

How does the executive branch enforce laws? ›

The President does not enforce the law alone. The Executive branch has a variety of Cabinets, executive departments, agencies, and government corporations that assist the President to ensure that the laws of the United States are followed.

What are the 3 most important parts of the Constitution? ›

The Constitution itself is divided into three major parts, the Preamble, seven articles, and amendments. The Preamble, or introduction introduces the main purpose of the U.S. Constitution, and why it was needed.

What are the 3 main principles of the Constitution? ›

Federalism aside, three key principles are the crux of the Constitution: separation of powers, checks and balances, and bicameralism.

What is the purpose of Constitution? ›

A chief aim of the Constitution as drafted by the Convention was to create a government with enough power to act on a national level, but without so much power that fundamental rights would be at risk.

What are the 7 articles of the Constitution? ›

  • Article I. Legislative Branch.
  • Article II. Executive Branch.
  • Article III. Judicial Branch.
  • Article IV. States, Citizenship, New States.
  • Article V. Amendment Process.
  • Article VI. Debts, Supremacy, Oaths, Religious Tests.
  • Article VII. Ratification.

What are the 4 main objectives of the Constitution? ›

The Preamble of this document states its six main goals: to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to ensure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty.

What are the 4 main parts of the Constitution? ›

The Constitution of the United States of America (see explanation)
  • Preamble ["We the people"] (see explanation)
  • Article I [The Legislative Branch] (see explanation) ...
  • Article II [The Presidency] (see explanation) ...
  • Article III [The Judiciary] (see explanation) ...
  • Article IV [The States] (see explanation)

What are the 10 constitutional rights? ›

Bill of Rights - The Really Brief Version
1Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
7Right of trial by jury in civil cases.
8Freedom from excessive bail, cruel and unusual punishments.
9Other rights of the people.
10Powers reserved to the states.
5 more rows

What are the 10 amendment rights? ›

10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

What do we call the first 10 minutes of the Constitution? ›

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans' rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.

Is executive action in the Constitution? ›

There is no specific provision in the United States Constitution for Executive Orders. However, Section 1 of Article II (the Executive Power) is generally viewed as granting authority for such orders.

Is the power of executive order in the Constitution? ›

The United States Constitution does not have a provision that explicitly permits the use of executive orders.

What section of the Constitution is the executive? ›

The Executive, pursuant to section 61 of the Constitution, clearly has the power to enter into treaties.

What is executive quizlet? ›

The executive branch of the U.S. government is responsible for enforcing laws; its power is vested in the President. The President acts as both the head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Independent federal agencies are tasked with enforcing the laws enacted by Congress.

What is the executive summary meaning? ›

An executive summary is the first section of a business plan and is generally considered the most important. Typically 2-4 pages long, the executive summary is often written last, after the entire plan has been finalized. The executive summary then covers the highlights of all the other sections.

Who is considered an executive? ›

What is considered an executive position? An executive is defined as an individual who holds administrative or supervisory authority in an organization. So, while many companies consider positions in the C-suite to be executive positions, any managerial position is an executive position.

What are 5 of the 15 departments of the executive branch? ›

The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the ...

What are the 6 major things that the executive branch does? ›

The executive branch enforces the laws of the United States, spends money as allowed by Congress, declares states of emergency, appoints Judges to the Supreme Court, and grants pardons for crimes. The judicial branch intreprets laws, judges when a law is unconstitutional, and makes arrangements for prisoners.

What are the four functions of the executive? ›

The principal functions of the Executive are the enforcement of laws, appointment-making functions, treaty-making functions, war & peace functions, foreign policy-making relations, policy-making, etc. The executive is the most powerful and second most powerful organ of government.

What are the 2 main functions of the executive branch? ›

The Executive Branch conducts diplomacy with other nations and the President has the power to negotiate and sign treaties, which the Senate ratifies. The President can issue executive orders, which direct executive officers or clarify and further existing laws.

What are the 8 powers of the executive branch? ›

  • 1 Commander-in-chief.
  • 2 Executive powers.
  • 3 Powers related to legislation.
  • 4 Powers of appointment.
  • 5 Executive clemency.
  • 6 Foreign affairs.
  • 7 Emergency powers.
  • 8 Executive privilege.

What are 10 things the executive branch does? ›

  • make treaties with the approval of the Senate.
  • veto bills and sign bills.
  • represent our nation in talks with foreign countries.
  • enforce the laws that Congress passes.
  • act as Commander-in-Chief during a war.
  • call out troops to protect our nation against an attack.

Who is the head of the executive branch? ›

The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States, who also acts as head of state and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

What are the six main divisions in the Executive Office of the President? ›

The following entities exist within the Executive Office of the President:
  • Council of Economic Advisers.
  • Council on Environmental Quality.
  • Executive Residence.
  • National Security Council.
  • Office of Administration.
  • Office of Management and Budget.
  • Office of National Drug Control Policy.
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy.

What is the executive branch responsible for *? ›

The executive branch consists of the President, his or her advisors and various departments and agencies. This branch is responsible for enforcing the laws of the land.


1. Origins of the Executive Branch - U.S. Constitution
2. Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States
(The Federalist Society)
3. The Executive Power: A King Minus Powers Given to Congress or Subservient to the Legislature?
(The Federalist Society)
4. Understanding the Constitution: Executive Branch
(Harmony Square)
5. Threats and challenges Indian Constitution faces | Prof. A. Karunanandan | St. Mary’s College
6. Executive Power & the Louisiana Purchase
(The Federalist Society)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edmund Hettinger DC

Last Updated: 02/04/2023

Views: 5986

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edmund Hettinger DC

Birthday: 1994-08-17

Address: 2033 Gerhold Pine, Port Jocelyn, VA 12101-5654

Phone: +8524399971620

Job: Central Manufacturing Supervisor

Hobby: Jogging, Metalworking, Tai chi, Shopping, Puzzles, Rock climbing, Crocheting

Introduction: My name is Edmund Hettinger DC, I am a adventurous, colorful, gifted, determined, precious, open, colorful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.